The Kitty Packard Pictorial


The Nicholas Brothers & Cab Calloway

These fellas need no introduction. The Nicholas Brothers were and are, simply, the most unbelievable dancers to ever grace our planet earth. Here they share screen time with Cab Calloway and exhibit the sort of gracefully artistic yet hard-core athleticism that led to their ultimate immortality. Now, I simply adore Fred Astaire and Gene Kelly, but even they were obliged to tip their hats at the true masters of tap: Fayard Antonio and Harold Lloyd Nicholas.

There simply aren’t words, ladies and gents. No words. Only perfection.



The History of Jazz in 1948

Hi all!

Kitty Packard has been having something of an extended sojourn as of late and I felt it necessary to implore your forgiveness with this post. A personal favorite from 1948, A Song is Born is the Howard Hawks‘ remake of his beloved 1941 screwball Barbara Stanwyck and Gary Cooper starrer, Ball of Fire.

In my opinion, this particular segment of celluloid is living history in its most impressively organic form. Here we have the unprecedented (and arguably unmatched) interracial jazz ensemble of Tommy Dorsey, Lionel Hampton, Mel Powell, Benny Goodman, Charlie Barnett (WOW) and Pops himself, Louis Armstrong, jamming together in the film’s titular ‘A Song is  Born.’ The rehashed plot with Danny Kaye and Virginia Mayo may lack Hawk’s original, shall we say, oomph, but the music makes the film positively priceless. (And in my opinion, the Kaye-Mayo combo is amongst the most underrated screen successes.)

Watch here as some of the very greatest jazz greats get their groove on.



Project 39: King of the Underworld

project3923Yesterday, January 14th, marked the 70th anniversary release of Lewis Seiler’s King of the Underworld, which makes it the subject of today’s Project 39.  The film is a remake of the just-OK 1935 crime drama Dr. Socrates and no improvements to the original are really evident–except, of course, for one particular casting choice. The plot sounds good: man and wife save a gangster. Gangster exploits them, kills husband and leaves wife to take the wrap. Wife takes matter into her own hands when Gangster is poised to strike again. And with Humphrey Bogart as the gangster and the exquisite Kay Francis as the wife (who is also a female doctor), the recipe looks delicious. Only instead of a choice prime rib, King of the Underworld is more like a … well … a turkey with some serious plot holes and a woeful script for stuffing.

The big plus is Bogart’s performance–it’s proof that he can carry a film in spite of a dreary script because, in spite of its flaws, Underworld is still an enjoyable period gangster flick. Especially when Bogart snarls out “First time anybody ever told me to keep my mouth shut and got away with it.”  He is definitely worth the price of admission here.

o_otqfbifbwdzh1hs



Scott Feinberg’s 28 Iconic Movie Dresses
January 15, 2009, 4:59 pm
Filed under: arts, cinema, classic movies, culture, entertainment, fashion, film, history, hollywood, movies

tophatAwards analyst and all-around cineaste Scott Feinberg is in the middle of a mah-velous series of blog posts that take a look at some of the most iconic dresses in the movies.  It may sound rather frivolous, and perhaps in the hands of someone else it would be, but not so with Feinberg. The man is serious about the movies and definitely knows his stuff. And so to come up with this exclusive list, Feinberg performed an extensive survey with fashion experts and professors and combed through the silent celluloid right up to today to “identify the most iconic movie dresses in cinema history.” There’s plenty of cinema history here, folks, and I urge classic movie fans everywhere to check out his 28 winners.

So far, the list includes Cate Blanchett’s red dress from The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, Ginger Rogers feather dress from Top Hat and Jean Harlow’s white hot satin number from Dinner at Eight.



In Memoriam: Ricardo Montalban (1920 – 2009)
January 14, 2009, 11:40 pm
Filed under: culture, hollywood, movies | Tags:

hmprricardomontalbanRicardo Montalban, the prolific Mexican actor whose career spanned 5 decades of film and television, passed away today, January 14, 2009. He was 88. An MGM fixture in the late 40s, the handsome young Montalban first came to public attention in a series of Esther Williams films, Neptune’s Daughter being the most notable, and he appeared opposite contemporary luminaries such as Lana Turner, Cyd Charisse and Jane Powell. Montalban proved there was more to him than just a handsome face by stretching his acting chops in some truly great classics, Joshua Logan’s Sayonara and William Wellman’s excellent Battleground among them.  And in the early 80s, Montalban entered into Science-Fiction immortality with his role in the Star Trekkie favorite The Wrath of Kahn. Television welcomed Montalban (and that purring, sexy accent of his) through the 60s, 70s and 80s and he will perhaps be best remembered for his famous role as the mysteriously debonair, white-suited Mr. Roarke of ABC’s popular Fantasy Island.

2weeks2a



New York Times, August 6 1938 – “Urging Old Age Security”

Fun and informative article from the New York Times, back on August 7, 1938 that takes a look at Hollywood’s proclivity for ignoring the 35-45 age group in movies, and asks how many actors will be has-beens by age 38? Claudette Colbert? Clark Gable? To quote, “Under the present system [the actor] is, relatively, a short term investment, valuable only until his glamour fades, then relegated, if his is fortunate, to supporting roles to bits or extra work. “ Written by Frank Nugent (who would later find fame as the writer of such classics as Fort Apache, The Quiet Man and Mr. Roberts) it is a sharply written assessment of the state of the then-all-powerful Hollywood studio system and its obsession with youth.
Further proof that some things just never change.
Happy reading!

Urging Old Age Security
By Frank Nugent

The more sensible policy on vacation eve, would have been to resign this column to a No Sunday Article dealing with the encounter between Briar, our city-bred Airedale, and an anonymous but devastatingly accurate Westport skunk. We realized, though, that it might put the department in bad odor, so we had to turn to the age problem in Hollywood. The industry still appears unable to let its children grow old gracefully. At one extreme there is Helen Hayes, who is invited to play a grandmother role: at the other is Alive Faye, who joined “Alexander’s Ragtime Band” in 1911, left it in 1928 and managed to traverse twenty-seven years without gaining a pound, a gray hair or a wrinkle.

And there really isn’t much of a middle ground. Life in the movies begins at 21 or at 55; no producer seems terribly interested in the adventures of the 35 to 45 age group. In fact, none of our leading ladies would admit membership in it. The minute the player does, she becomes a “character” and is packed off to be Mrs. Judge Hardy for Lewis Stone or Mother Carey for Kate Douglas Wiggin. Or, of course, she might turn out to be Edna Mae Oliver, Alice Brady or Mary Boland. The life of the leading man may last awhile longer, William Powell still packs a romantic punch and so does Ronald Colman. But they have the advantage of charm and their appeal to women in the sub-35 age group. Actually, they haven’t begun to age.

We’ve often wondered what will happen to Shirley Temple when she grows up, but there’s more reason to puzzle over the future of Caorle Lombard, Claudette Colbert, Robert Taylor, Clark Gable, Marlene Dietrich, Fred MacMurray and Joan Crawford. Will their producers age them gently or fight off Father Time with makeup and soft lighting? How many of today’s stare will edge gradually into character roles, how many will be has-beens at 38? We wish the actuaries would look into the film records and determine the box office morality of stars. Better still, we wish the industry would give more thought to conservation of its natural resources.

There’s no reason, so far as we can see, for the screen’s disinterest in the lives of men and women past the 100-yard dash stage. We know a few , interesting people, with problems of their own, not simply those reflected by the romantic courses of stripling sons and daughters. In  fact, some of them have no striplings to supply the reflected glory. They shine by themselves, but not on the screen. What’s wrong with middle age, anyway, that Hollywood continually stops short of it or goes hurtling beyond it into the grimly sentimental dramas of old folks at home?

Foreign producers have opened the field a bit. “Carnet de Bal” was the story of a woman, widowed after 21 years, who looked up all her former sweethearts and found how slightly and how greatly she had affected their lives. The heroine, obviously, was almost 40. Her ex-suitors were that or more. Yet it was one of the most interesting pictures of the year. England has just given us “South Riding” another story about grownups.

Hollywood’s refusal to meet maturity halfway has its amusing side. There was that clause in one actresses contract, which stipulated she was never asked to play a mother. (we forget now whether it was Mae West or Marion Davies). There is this furor on the coast over the casting of Scarlett in Gone With the Wind with Norma Shearer, Miriam Hopkins and dozens of others evincing no doubts whatever their fitness to portray a precocious minx whose age span in the novel was from 16 to 22. There is Miss Faye, as mentioned before, absorbing 27 years without a facial change and Kay Francis pretending to be the mother of four, Anita Louise included.

But if all this I amusing, it is pathetic and stupid too. Pathetic because it betrays the vanity of players, stupid because it so clearly dooms Hollywood to economic loss. Every actor in every studio is an investment—investment in publicity, in promotion, popularity. Under the present system he is, relatively, a short term investment, valuable only until his glamour fades, then relegated, if his is fortunate, to supporting roles to bit s or extra work. If, by natural and gradual process, he could be brought from the romantic role into the mature role, and if at the same time, this new story field were developed, his acting career might be prolonged indefinitely, at created profit to the studio and at greater security for the star. The huge salary peaks might be leveled off and (just pathetically) screen acting would be better.

It might even be possible, should such a policy be adopted, which we doubt, that Mr. Taylor might be discernable years hence in a Lionel Barrymore role: that Mr. Gable prove to be the Edward Arnold of his new day; that Shirley herself group to be Ruby Keeler, Eleanor Powell or Kate Smith. A delightful prospect meets the eye.

————-



Vintage Magazine: Modern Priscilla, 1923
January 14, 2009, 7:18 am
Filed under: 1920s, art, culture, illustration, journalism, nostalgia

Another magazine cover and advertisement plucked from my collection. The Modern Priscilla was a precursor to the Women’s Day magazines we know today: sewing patterns, recipes, cooking tips and trends fill the pages. These magazines don’t have the wit or flash of, say, the era’s Vogue and Cosmopolitans, but they are still fun to read. Color ads are few, but do they ever pop!

modernpriscilla2modernpriscilla



Project 39 – Son of Frankenstein

project3922Project 39 continues with the 70th anniversary of the release Rowland V. Lee’s Son of Frankenstein. In this third installment, Dr. Frankenstein’s son returns home to the family castle where the mysterious Ygor reveals that Dr. Frankenstein’s Monster is still very much alive.   Son of Frankenstein is an overlooked film in the Frankenstein franchise and is a surprisingly solid 200px-son_of_frankenstein_movie_postersequel to James Whale’s Frankenstein and Bride of Frankenstein. With set productions by the great Jack Otterson of Dr. Caligari fame, Son is synonymous with cinematic expressionism: the film is all creeping shadows, dark corners, abstract angles and sinister fog and a cast that seems to have been concocted in a Transylvania test tube:  Basil Rathbone as Dr. Frankenstein’s son, Baron von Frankenstein, Bela Lugosi as Ygor, Lionel Atwill as Krogh and, of course, Boris Karloff as The Monster.  It is also a stand-alone sequel that does not require previous viewing to enjoy the plot and has the panache of the best 30s horror flicks.



The 66th Annual Golden Globes

Below is the Golden Globes wrap-up by Daily Variety’s Brian Lowry:

Ah, well, at least that was an improvement over last year – when the strike-disrupted Golden Globes shriveled to more of a misshapen pyrite orb, in the form of a glorified press conference. OK, so the room seemed inordinately unruly, or maybe it was just all that ambient sound coming out of the commercial breaks, forcing presenters to hush the audience like stern schoolmarms. For the most part the telecast managed to live both up and down to the Globes’ reputation – a relatively loose, breezy affair offering plenty of eye candy, without any major glitches or, alas, indelible snafus.

Frankly, the night would have been worth the price of admission strictly for Ricky Gervais, who – referencing his lack of a nomination for the boxoffice flop “Ghost Town” – said that would be “the last time I have sex with 200 middle-aged journalists.” (That’s even funnier considering that the figure is roughly 2 ½ times the HFPA’s actual membership.)

Yet there were other memorable moments: Sally Hawkins’ tearful acceptance for “Happy-Go-Lucky;” the spontaneous standing ovation for the late Heath Ledger in “The Dark Knight” and director Chris Nolan’s eloquent tribute; Steven Spielberg’s simple pitch for the industry’s fortunate few to pay it forward by mentoring others; the ebullient response to “Slumdog Millionaire,” infectious even here; and Sacha Baron Cohen producing uncomfortable groans with, of all things, a joke about Madonna’s marital woes.

That said, the Globes’ high tolerance for windy speeches can render someone as seemingly charming as Kate Winslet tedious if they persist in rifling through a laundry list of thank-yous (twice, no less), or, in the case of Colin Farrell, merely semi-comprehensible. A happy medium between playing people off ruthlessly and letting them prattle on endlessly surely must exist somewhere.

Still, the Hollywood Foreign Press Assn. always manages to keep things interesting by virtue of their choices, which invariably yield a highly telegenic, star-laden broadcast.

Politics were a part of the festivities, but in a relatively muted way. Tracy Morgan joked that Barack Obama’s election made him the official spokesman for “30 Rock,” while Laura Dern expressed enthusiasm for the new administration after playing Republican bogeywoman Katherine Harris in HBO’s “Recount.” The director of Israel’s foreign-language victor “Waltz With Bashir” also voiced hope for Middle East peace.

As for the restlessness that lurked off camera, perhaps that was just pent-up energy after the last muted go-round, the uncertainty surrounding the Screen Actors Guild contract negotiations and all the grimness regarding the economy. And from that perspective, who could blame them? 

 

And the Guardian has published their selection for the best and worst red carpet vestments.




The Kitty Packard Pictorial of the Month: Jean Harlow

harlow1I am going to be closed off to the world tonight, January 10, as TCM airs a 5-film tribute to the silver screen’s original (and my favorite) platinum blonde bombshell, Jean Harlow, with Dinner At Eight (1933), Bombshell (1933), Platinum Blonde (1931), Hold Your Man (1933) and The Public Enemy (1931).  This being the case, I felt it to be the perfect opportunity to introduce a new Kitty Packard Pictorial feature: the Pictorial of the Month.  The Pictorial of the Month will be a special spotlight on a classic icon of yesteryear and it is only appropriate that our inaugural Pictorial should belong to Miss Harlow as she is the reason this blog is even here to begin with.

Jean Harlow’s tragically short 26 years of life were marked with tragedy, disappointments, heartbreak and, of course, a tremendously successful screen career. Her intensely sensual on screen presence ignited American movies and gave the world something it had never before known: the blondeharlow3 bombshell. She was beautiful, true, but hers was an attainable beauty that led even Harlow herself to admit that “men like me because I don’t wear a brassiere. Women like me because I don’t look like a girl who would steal a husband.” She was a natural comedienne with a gift for belting out the difficult, rapid-fire dialogue that made some of the best films of the mid 30s truly unforgettable.  She was not, even by her own admission, a great actress and because of this awareness Harlow worked hard at her craft and eventually would successfully hone her screen personality into one of the most enduring in motion picture history: the sassy, saucy girl from the wrong side of the tracks.

harlow5

harlow4But Jean Harlow’s on screen character belied the real girl underneath. She was not Dinner at Eight’s common-as-the cold Kitty Packard, nor Red Headed Woman’s amoral Lil Andrews.  Harlean Carpenter was a shy dentist’s daughter with a heart of gold from a perfectly respectable middle class Kansas City family. She was an actress simply because it was her job and would have been quite happy darning socks for a household of little Harleans. Her mild nature and her mother’s constant presence led her to be known as ‘the baby’ around the MGM. Unlike her rivals like Joan Crafword, Harlow was known for knitting and hemstitching in between takes, was something of a bookworm and was generous to a fault.

The story of Jean Harlow’s movie stardom is a curious one indeed since it was never truly her career–it belonged to her mother, Jean Harlow. And by extension, one could argue that Jean Harlow didn’t really ever have a life of her own–it too belonged to her mother who had an extraordinarily firm grip on every aspect of her daughter’s life.  Throughout Harlean’s childhood, her relationship with her mother was of uncommon closeness. Harlean had health issues as a child including a bout of scarlet fever, which only added to Mother Jean’s protectiveness.

annex-harlow-jean_071

After Mother Jean’s divorce in the early 1920s, she packed up and moved herself and her only daughter out to Hollywood where Harlean attended the Hollywood School for Girls and Mother Jean pursued her dream of acting.  She was beautiful, but simply too old, and with her dreams thwarted, they were soon headed back for Missouri. There, Mother Jean married a man of questionable work ethics named Marino Bello. Not long after, a 16-year-old Harlean eloped with a young businessman who had a large inheritance. She left school forever and the headed for the West Coast with her new husband where they lived lavishly in the Los Angeles social circles. She was free of her Mother for the time being, but Mother Jean and her husband weren’t far behind. When Harlean’s marriage fell apart, she realized that there was only one way to support herself and her mother and father-in-law in their accustomed fashion.  Having done movie work before, purely as a laugh (she’d been bet by a friend that she didn’t have the guts to audition), it was the only professional experience she actually had to her credit and, urged by a mother obsessed with living out her thwarted dreams through daughter, Harlean adopted her mother’s name and became a regular at Fox Studios’s central casting.

Her bit in the Laurel & Hardy silent laffer Double Whoppee was memorable for some very obharlow_hughesvious reasons but the roles were largely very forgettable. And then came Howard Hughes. In 1929, Hughes was in the middle of re shooting his massively over budget wartime epic Hell’s Angels when Jean was brought to his attention.  He hired her on the spot. Her role as the vamping girl toy Helen (which features the only color footage of Harlow in existence) floored audiences but was slammed by the critics who called her, among other things, just ‘awful.’ The movie was a box-office grand slam. She had something–even if it wasn’t a pair of acting chops. Her next roles were more of the same bad girl floozy type that Hells Angels had pigeonholed her as and, as a result, made Louis B Mayer quite indifferent to the urging of producer Paul Bern to try and acquire Harlow from Hughes. She just wasn’t, in Mayer’s opinion, a lady. But when Bern bended Irving Thalberg’s ear, Thalberg listened and MGM bought Harlow from Hughes.

harlow7

Jean’s rise to superstardom wasn’t overnight. Harlow was placed in the lead role for Red Headed Woman with Chester Morris and then opposite MGM’s top male star, Clark Gable, in Victor Fleming’s Red Dust. Both were tremendously popular with annex-harlow-jean-red-headed-woman_031audiences and both were tremendously troubling to the censors, leading to increased efforts to enforce the unpopular Hays Production Code. These roles were manipulative women who lacked any type of moral instinct, slept their way around town, drank and spoke in thinly veiled innuendos. Because Harlow nailed the characters so well, it led many to believe that was who she was. It couldn’t have been further from the truth. In real life, the role was reversed: it was Harlow who allowed herself to be manipulated by those she loved most and she worked hard to keep her mother approving and to keep her father-in-law, whom she disliked intensely, quiet. Of course it needs to be said that she didn’t exactly make the best decisions. But since when do 21 year old’s make good decisions?

reddust1

Paul Bern, the producer that had brought Harlow to MGM proposed to her in 1932. She was 21. He was 43. The marriage was a mistake from the beginning and lasted all of two months, ending when Bern was found dead in their home from a shot to the head. MGM were masters of staving off scandal and they put round the story that Bern had shot himself in the head because he was impotent and incapable of consummating his marriage with Harlow, getting the idea from a note supposedly ‘left’ by Bern’s body. The note read simply: “you understand that last night was only a comedy.” (The Paul Bern death could fill the pages of a novel, so for more information on the mystery pick up a copy of David Stenn’s most excellent Harlow biography Bombshell.) Bern was Irving Thalberg’s best friend and at first he and wife Norma Shearer, along with a number of Bern’s other friends, shunned Harlow. But even after Harlow was cleared of any involvement with Bern’s death and the Hollywood community began to rally around her in support, Harlow blamed herself entirely and felt unworthy of the sympathy of any of her colleagues. It worsened Harlow’s already considerable inferiority complex she suffered from under her mother’s autocratic rule and she developed two excesses: an overdeveloped guilt complex and a growing dependency upon alcohol.

annex-harlow-jean_461

Recovery from scandal is hard enough today even in our ultra-permissive society, but in those days scandal could literally mean the end of your career. But after Paul Bern’s death, Harlow’s career skyannex-harlow-jean-reckless_01rocketed into superstardom. Bombshell, Dinner at Eight Hold Your Man, China Sea. She had found her knack for comedy. The critics suddenly found themselves praising her street-smart approach. Dinner at Eight was a George Cukor’s masterpiece. Bombshell was Jean Harlow as Jean Harlow–it was practically an autobiography and she was positively infectious. China Sea was yet another Harlow-Gable smash. Then came Reckless. Harlow could neither sing nor dance, and here she was expected to star in a film about a famous singer. Her mother’s constant presence on the set added to the pressure. A fellow dancer in the cast recounted stories of Harlow getting hungry and her mother allowing her daughter a scant ration of cottage cheese and shredded carrots each day. The film was a flop.

Harlow was fed up with people thinking she was ‘that kind of a girl,’ and MGM went about the business of remaking her image with one smart move: her platinum locks were darkened to ‘brownette.’ Harlow was thrilled. “No woman will ever be afraid of me again,” she said with relief at finally not having to live up to the platinum image that was so very much unlike herself. Her roles in Riffraff and Wife vs. Secretary were a complete 180 from the Lil Andrews and Kitty Packards of the past.

annex-harlow-jean_08

Reckless hbillandbabyad brought her into the life of the older and urbane William Powell. Jean truly believed that she had finally met the love of her life. It is no secret that Harlow loved Powell considerably more than he did her, but they became serious lovers nonetheless. The did get along well together and Powell was very good for her in that he taught her a lot about taking control of her finances as well as trying to get her to take steps to try and pry her from her mother and father-in-laws dominance. But the problem was that Powell didn’t understand that Harlow was completely unlike the other girls he normally went with. Whereas the likes of Carol Lombard were street tough and brilliantly witty, Harlow was shy, sensitive and overly eager to please. Powell was a great put-down artist—he knew Harlow had a brain and was nothing like her on screen characters, but he liked to make digs at her about it nonetheless. Although it maharlowpowelly have very well been all in good fun, his digs inwardly devastated the insecure Harlow. He thought that Harlow could just take it, the way everyone else could. He thought wrong. Harlow was heartsick over Powell’s unwillingness to marry her and her drinking worsened. The perpetually guilt-stricken Harlow could never hope to understand that it was not her fault: Powell was simply afraid to marry her.

Myrna Loy, Powell’s famous co-star, became a close confident of Jean’s during her roller coaster relationship with Powell and called her friendship with Harlow one of her ‘most treasured.’Loy is also one of the many people who noticed a marked change in Harlow’s appearance and urged her to consider seeing a doctor. Harlow had started to put on weight and was frequently tired and irritable. But in spite of her personal uncertainty, her pictures continued to be solid blockbusters. Libeled Lady was one of the best comedies of the 30s and her next film Saratoga re-teamed her with Gable.

annex-harlow-jean-wife-vs-secretary_02

But the people around Harlow knew she wasn’t well. George Hurrell had to retouch her photographs and her extreme unhappiness had begun to changer her very personality. Close friend Rosalind Russell had to make repeated trips to local bars to take Harlow home.

Russell would later say that Harlow became “a sad girl, driven by her mother, madly in love with a man who wouldn’t marry her and drinking too much.” Russell was very concerned when she saw Harlow, who was not an angry or violent person, become blatantly hostile. It was the other end of the pendulum. Biographer Stenn says “the more she drank, the more she hated her mother. She became verbally abusive. On film, Harlow’s fury was funny. Off screen, her tantrums were terrifying.

saratoga1

Filming for Saratoga was not smooth going and Harlow became increasingly unwell. No one could have dreamed that MGM’s ‘baby,’ all of 26 years old, was dying. The rumors of the cause of her death were far-fetched and blown out of proportion for years, but Jean’s death was the result of uremic poisoning and kidney failure. The scarlet fever she suffered in her childhood had doomed her and her kidneys had been failing for years. True, she was misdiagnosed, but even if she had been properly diagnosed, in the 1930s there was no such thing as dialysis for kidney failure. Nothing could have been done to save her. And even if there had, her Doctor later said that Harlow ‘didn’t want to be saved. She had no will to live whatsoever.’

It took years for a devastated William Powell to recover from Jean’s death. Without her ‘baby,’ Mother Jean deteriorated into an eventual state of complete dementia. Workers at MGM left their sets, unable to work when they heard the news. Harlow probably would have never believed any of it.

harlow-jean_012

But Harlow’s image has passed on into immortality and her spirit is preserved perfectly on celluloid. Long after we’re gone, the simple dentist’s daughter from the Midwest who never thought anything of herself will still be there for the world to see: beautiful, young and eternal.