The Kitty Packard Pictorial


Fellini Springs Eternal

I’ve been on some sort of Fellini trip as of late.

Just haven’t been able to get enough of the man and his supremely sensuous phantasmagoria of time, space, shadow and light.

Few directors have so effortlessly (seemingly) blurred the line of fact, fiction, fantasy and farce with such delirious delight … and I think it’s safe to say that 8 1/2, his 1963 masterpiece, is the high watermark of his artistic achievements. (Though not without heated debate, I’m sure!)

If you haven’t seen the film in a while, please revisit it… it’s the sort of film that is entirely like a good bottle of old wine.

Call it ‘neorealism,’ or any other fancy schmansy moniker you can conjure … whatever ‘it‘ is, I’ll tell ya right now, Fellini’s ‘it‘ is eternal.

Just ask Marcello. ;)

812f

Marcello Mastroianni as "Guido" in Fellini's 8 1/2. (swoon, faint, thud.)

812e

Guido, the disillusioned director.

812d

foreplay a la Fellini.

81ji

No one else but Fellini could pull this off....

812

Marcello upside down and delicous...

812B

SARAGHINA!!!!

812c

shadow ... light ... composition ... perfection ...

812g

Fellini proving, once again, he's the master.

812h

Guido, eight miles high.

812i

Marcello.



Poetry in Motion: Jane Campion’s Bright Star
bright-star

Poetry in the key of Time.

Normally, I am not exactly what you would call a fan of Jane Campion’s films.

But a few weeks ago, I went to the theater and gave her latest film, Bright Star, a chance. Mostly because Kenneth Turan, the Los Angeles Times’ resident film critic, gave it a simply glowing review … and Turan is rather known for not giving glowing reviews.

I went in with my nose firmly placed in the air, ready to massacre what I was certain would be a self-important, purposefully ‘arty’ picture. And, suddenly, about an hour into it, I realized that I was crying … for no apparent reason at all. It was simply a matter of an unexpected, rushing wave of emotion sweeping over me, and I was caught in its riptide, helpless to resist. The same sort of feeling one gets when reading a challenging poem: the initial distrust, and then, bang, the thrust of emotion that leaves you thoroughly winded … and utterly in love. Rather like a Keats poem, to be honest.

Which is why Bright Star, the delicately beautiful film about the famous love affair between the young John Keats and Fanny Brawne starring the exquisite Abbie Cornish and Ben Whishaw, is so powerfully sensitive and entirely effective. It feels like a poem … not like someone pushing poetry down your throat which, I’m sure you’ll agree, makes all the difference in the world.

Rapturous in its realism, Bright Star feels and breathes and seethes with life and love and beauty. The early 19th century has never been so extraordinarily organic. Even though just a spectator in 2-D, the film pops with color, and vibrancy—we feel the flush of wind on Fanny’s fabric, the fragility of Keat’s coat collar, the quiet sunlight over a field of lavender, the warm breath of a tentative kiss… it is something rarely achieved on screen with such mastery, and my previous issues with Ms. Campions’ pretension have been duly sated.

The film itself is not likely to make a dent in the coming awards season, such is the lot of films of its beauty and weight, but if there’s one thing sure to seduce Academy voters it must surely be the exquisitely artful use of costume. The fabric of Miss Fanny Brawne’s clothing is as much a part of the film’s tapestry as Fanny herself … below are a few of what I consider to be the highlights ….

Fanny in throes of love.

A portrait in Lavender.

BrightStar4

Fanny fast at work on a new design ...

... and the r

...and the beautiful result.

BrightStar3

And another of Fanny's fine bespoke creations.

BrightStar6

The Two Lovers.



Movie of the Month: My Man Godfrey
original 1936 poster art

original 1936 poster art

“God, but this film is beautiful,” Roger Ebert once said of Gregory La Cava’s 1936 satirical screwball comedy My Man Godfrey. “This movie, and the actors in it, and its style of production, and the system that produced it, and the audiences that loved it, have all been replaced by pop culture of brainless vulgarity. But the movie survives, and to watch it is to be rescued from some people who don’t care that it makes a difference …”

godfrey_credits

godfrey_1

From the first seconds that My Man Godfrey flickers onto the screen, it is quite clear this is not going to be your average screwball comedy. The blinking neon lights of a swell night out on the town are fetchingly rendered in the imaginative opening credits of Gregory La Cava’s 1936 satirical screwball, fading slowly into to the slums of Manhattan.  There on a city dump, vagrants live in a polite, civilized society of newspaper houses and cardboard beds. They are the Forgotten Men of the Great Depression— left to rot in dirt while Manhattan’s high society parties high above their shadow. This is going to be class-conscious comedy at its finest.

Bursting into the well-mannered civility of tramp life are two spoiled, deliriously disillusioned young Park Avenue socialites. Cornelia and Irene Bullock, glittering in their expensive silk and furs, descend upon the down-and-out itinerants with eager claws. They are in the midst of a scavenger hunt being hosted at the Waldorf Ritz Hotel, and the last item to be found before they can win their prize? A Forgotten Man.
For what could be more offensively insensitive than for the idle rich to find amusement in the plight of the poor, and to exploit the helplessness of poverty with something as absurd as a scavenger hunt.

The eldest Bullock—the frighteningly beautiful Cornelia (played with venomous sex appeal by Gail Patrick) offers one of the tramps $5 to come with her to the Waldorf Ritz. When the tramp realizes he is to be paraded in front of high society for a lark, he darkens and verbally lays into the heiress with such anger that she falls backwards onto an ash pile.

'Let's beat Cornelia.'

'Let's beat Cornelia.'

While Cornelia marches of in a huff, the younger sister (a delightfully dizzy Carole Lombard) is quite happy to make a quick exit, but not before Godfrey gives her a piece of his mind. However, her doe-eyed innocence tempers him and he suggests that the two go to the Waldorf Ritz. “Let’s beat Cornelia.”

Upon arrival at the hotel, Godfrey finds himself in the middle of a mad house— the refined upper crust of the Manhattan aristocracy have converged in a glittering ballroom like a marauding band of pirates—goats, goldfish, spinning wheels and all manner of livestock are present as their captors battle it out to win the scavenger contest.
Indeed, as Mr. Bullock says (the booming baritone voiced Eugene Pallete) ‘all you need to start an asylum is a room and the right kind of people.’

Eugene Pallete as Mr. Bullock

Eugene Pallete as Mr. Bullock

The only figure of reason and dignity to be found in the room is the forgotten man that Irene drags to the platform. Upon winning the scavenger hunt, Godfrey is urged to make a speech. His words set the tone for the rest of the picture:

My purpose in coming here tonight was twofold. First, I wanted to aid this young lady. Second, I was interested to see how a pack of empty-headed nitwits conducted themselves. My curiosity has been satisfied. I assure you, it will be a pleasure to return to a society of really important people.’

And here is where we understand that although we are in for an hour and a half of outlandish zanity (I know zanity isn’t a word, but it should be, darn it!), in what is a peerless screwball comedy, we are in actuality witnessing a relentlessly acerbic statement against the social injustices that were so violently felt during the dark throes of the depression.
Gregory LaCava examines this social dichotomy by implanting the dignified, decent Godfrey as the butler for the outlandish and thoroughly ridiculous Bullock family. Ridiculous doesn’t begin to cover it: it isn’t uncommon for the Bullock girls to march horses into the house and them promptly forget them in the library. Nor is it uncommon for Mr. Bullock to have to pay off policemen and Process Servants for his family’s indiscretions.

godfrey_6

godfrey_5a

godfrey_5b

Early on, Gregory La Cava's expert use of close-ups establishes the personalities of each of the main characters.

Godfrey's principle characters in close-up.

Scrubbed up and shaven, Godfrey cuts a distinguished figure that is the sole voice of reason in the household, and at once captures the heart and whimsy of little Irene and her continually unsuccessful attempts at capturing his attentions make for much of the film’s gaiety.

LaCava’s direction here is fluid. My Man Godfrey possesses the look and feel and nuance of a Lubitsch film, while containing the madcap insanity of a Marx Brothers romp. So flawless is LaCava’s navigation of this thoroughly ridiculous farce, that even though LaCava unequivocally makes the film’s message clear from act one scene one, he never makes us feel as though we are watching a ‘message film.’

godfrey_7

godfrey_8

Cornelia informs Godfrey she intends to make his life miserable.

Cornelia informs Godfrey she intends to make his life miserable.

And even though the film has a simply beautiful sheen to it—all silvery shimmery celluloid loveliness—LaCava manages to be very economical in his excess. For the world of the Bullocks is one of complete excess, yet never does LaCava allow the film to become self-indulgent or shallow. He frames his shots beautifully and his frequent use of close-ups is never superficial: they either serve to advance the story or bring depth to the character. Of which, there are many and most of them unforgettable.

Carlo (Mischa Auer) attempts to cheer up Irene...

Carlo (Mischa Auer) attempts to cheer up Irene...

... which only worsens Irene's fit ...

... but only makes it worse ...

... so she steals an unsolicited snog from Godfrey.

... so she steals an unsolicited snog from Godfrey.

Carol Lombard is at her unbridled, unrestrained best as the lovesick loony Irene Bullock who, although a spoiled little space cadet, has an endearing heart of gold and would be quite happy to live on a city dump with Godfrey for the rest of her life.  Her fearsome sister Cornelia is, as Godfrey puts it, a Park Avenue Brat, who decided to make an example out of Godfrey when he remains impervious to her advances by trying to make his life at the Bullock house something of a nightmare. Which includes her malevolent scheme to frame him as a common thief.

Carlo & Mrs. Bullock: two peas in a pod.

Carlo & Mrs. Bullock: two peas in a pod.

Cornelia Bullock: Park Avenue Brat

Cornelia Bullock: Park Avenue Brat

Impulsive, attention-hungry Iene

Impulsive, attention-hungry Iene

Alice Brady is an absolute delight as Angelica Bullock—a pleasantly dizzy socially conscious chameleon with a protégé named Carlo—the achingly funny Mischa Auer who is Mrs. Bullock’s pride and joy as well as the bane of Mr. Bullock’s existence. While Mr. Bullock’s hard earned fortune dwindles thanks to his family’s excesses (and his bad investments) it is easy for him to take most of his frustration out on the freeloading Carlo, an artiste in training whom Mrs. Bullock feels needs a constant atmosphere of idle reflection in order to cultivate his creativity.

And while the Bullock family delivers many high jinks and hilarity, the film as a whole is anchored in Godfrey’s resilient self-respect. He may be a homeless butler (or is he?) but he possesses more grace and decorum than any in the socially affluent Bullock household. William Powell’s dexterity of performance is quite remarkable and it is the absolute pillar upon which the film is built. His performance—shrewd, discreet and ever so urbane—is certainly why, seven decades on, the film still ticks like clockwork.

the butler didn't do it: Cornelias plot backfires.

the butler didn't do it: Cornelias plot backfires.

'You see, I like you very much ...'

'You see, I like you very much ...'

Godfrey reveals himself to be one of Society’s upper crust—Godfrey Park of Boston who, after suffering a devastating blow to his pride from a failed romance, took up residence on the city dump and therein learned true self respect and dignity from the men around him. His wily, business savvy leads him to single-handedly saving Mr. Bullock from financial ruin, and in so doing teaches Cornelia the fallacy of false pride, all the while trying to wean the smitten Irene from his arm for her own good … that is to say, his own good. Against Godfrey’s better judgment, he’s developed ‘that funny feeling’ for the girl and decides it best to make his exit.

Irene, of course, has other plans.

Irene feigns a faint.

Irene feigns a faint.

The film concludes in a perfect, beautiful circle as Godfrey transforms his old home at the city dump into a revitalization project called (what else?) The Dump: a swanky nightclub that provides quality lodging and honest work to the Forgotten Men who’d lived there. Irene, determined to be Mrs. Godfrey Smith/Park/Whoever, chases him to the dump equipped with baskets of firewood and food supplies and blankets, expecting to make a home amidst ash and rubbish piles.

The Dump

The Dump

'When something's got you, it's got you!'

'When something's got you, it's got you!'

'It'll all be over in a minute...'

'It'll all be over in a minute...'

Taking advantage of a justice of the peace dining at the club, Irene grabs hold of Godfrey’s hand and, as the justice begins the ceremony, she tells her speechless conquest, ‘Stand still Godfrey, it’ll all be over in a minute.’

The nobility of the working class everyman has rarely been so venerated, and the idle upper class has rarely been so scathingly reproached as in My Man Godfrey.  As the Bright Lights Film Journal puts it, “So long as we live in a world of vulgar inequalities, Godfrey will have relevance.”



UPDATE: The LACMA Film Program
August 26, 2009, 8:59 pm
Filed under: arts, cinema, culture, film, hollywood, movies, preservation

Hot off the Los Angeles Times press:

Responding to public outcry over the Los Angeles County Museum of Art’s decision to end its 40-year-old weekend film program, two outside organizations have stepped forward to pledge a total of $150,000 in the fight to save the screening series.

The Hollywood Foreign Press Assn., which organizes the annual Golden Globe Awards, and Time Warner Cable, in association with Ovation TV, have each agreed to put up $75,000 toward the LACMA film program, which had been scheduled to close in October.

In addition, Time Warner Cable and Ovation said that they will spend more than $1.5 million to market the film program across their multiple media platforms, both locally and nationally.

A spokeswoman for the museum told The Times that as a result of the new money, the film program will now continue at least through the end of the fiscal year in June 2010. She added that the museum will continue to seek additional donors and patrons in support of the film program.

In a statement, LACMA Director Michael Govan said that the museum is ”grateful to the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, Time Warner Cable, and Ovation TV,  for expressing their tangible support for the art of film at LACMA, and we’re very pleased that we can keep film rolling while we build for the future.”

The museum also announced that it intends to create a film department within its curatorial ranks that will be in charge of “thinking about the history and future of film as art as well as film’s increasing importance in the larger narrative of art history.”

– David Ng

Thanks to Marty and Mr. Shickel for getting the ball rolling on this, and to the Hollywood Foreign Press Assoc and (I never thought I’d say this) Time Warner Cable (even though they overcharged me two months in a row) for keeping LA’s premier film program alive!



(500) Days of Summer Walking Tour
Joseph Gordon-Levitt & Zooey Deschanel

Joseph Gordon-Levitt & Zooey Deschanel

OK all you Los Angelinos, mark your calendars: this Sunday, August 30, the Los Angeles Conservancy is holding a (500) Days of Summer architectural tour.

If you’ve had the chance to see this excellent indie rom-com, you’ll no doubt remember that the biggest scene-stealer in the film was the city of Angels herself. It is a singularly unique ‘LA movie’ in that it is in no way affiliated with anything Hollywood or Westside, but rather it revels in the neglected beauties of Broadway and Hill and Hope and Fig.

If you’re interested in seeing these gorgeous pieces of architecture first hand and are looking for something free to do, join the Conservancy on Sunday at 3:00pm for what will surely be a fascinating walking tour.

Here’s the lowdown from the Conservancy’s Flavorpill page:

Do you love the hit movie and want to know more about the locations where it was filmed? If so, join two film experts on Sunday, August 30 from 3 – 6 p.m. for a tour of some of the sites. Harry Medved, author of the SoCal movie location guidebook Hollywood Escapes, and Marty Cummins, a key assistant location manager for the film, will host and lead the tour. The tour starts at  Old Bank DVD, 400 S. Main St.

There’s no charge, although donations are welcome. Harry will be selling copies of Hollywood Escapes before and after the tour, with proceeds going directly to the Conservancy.



Spielberg Snatches Harvey
Best friends: Elwood & Harvey

Best friends: Elwood & Harvey

The relentless Hollywood remake machine strikes again.

The next classic film to get the rehash treatment in what has become a never-ending slew of rehash treatments? 1950’s Oscar winning light comedy Harvey.

That’s right, the much-loved precious Pooka tale is being retold with Steven Spielberg at the helm.

According to this morning’s Variety, shooting is going to start early next year and the role of Jimmy Stewart’s Elwood P. Down is expected to be offered to the likes of Tom Hanks and Will Smith.

Now, I absolutely adore Tom Hanks and definitely think that a family-friendly film might be good for his career at the moment, but … the obvious questions that begs to be answered is …

is this really necessary?

Sure, the original film was an adaptation of a Pulitzer prize winning play, and perhaps I am being a bit too protective. But … Harvey is such a part of postwar American idealism, I honestly do wonder if the story as a vehicle can even work anymore? The wide-eyed innocence that is so vital to Elwood P Dowd’s character simply doesn’t exist these days and I wonder if even someone as talented as Mr. Hanks would be able to pull it off in a manner that could make the audience believe in Harvey the way we do with Stewart.

And who could possibly follow Josephine Hull?

Sigh.

We’re going to keep the development of this project tightly under our radar.



The Red Shoes: Restored and Resplendent
Moira Shearer in The Red Shoes, 1948

Moira Shearer in The Red Shoes, 1948

Last night, I had the supreme pleasure of attending the North American world premiere of the newly restored version of Powell and Pressburger’s 1948 artistic marvel The Red Shoes. The film, one of cinema’s crowning achievements in color, motion and music, has been restored by the UCLA Film and Television archive, with the support of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, The Louis B Mayer Foundation and The Film Foundation.  Why a film that, even on shoddy VHS transfers is still eye-popping, would need restoration was the subject of last night’s opening discourse..

Thankfully the UCLA film preservationists got to work on the matter as mold had begun to deteriorate the original prints and color flickering, color fringing and misalignment turned the restoration process into a three-year labor of love. He prints are now ‘properly preserved for posterity.’

The results, I can assure you, are marvelous. It is a pity that films such as these cannot be easily seen on the big screen because the experience is truly, well, cinematic.  The sheer creative energy of  the late, great Jack Cardiff’s cinematography is amplified ten-fold.  Anton Walbrook, whose performance is riveting enough as it is even on the tiniest of screens, in its full-scale projected form nothing short of mesmerizing.  Moira Shearer’s acrobatic elegance is absolutely breathtaking on a thirty-foot screen–which turns into a swirling canvas of dreamy color for an exquisite 133 minutes.

The following is an excerpt from film historian Ian Christie’s lovely assessment of the meaning and importance of the Red Shoes:

“Seen in full-scale projection, The Red Shoes is not only one of cinema’s great sensuous experiences, but a profound mediation on the power and the price of the all-consuming spectacle. Beyond the intensity of its performances and the beauty of its images, it is this reflexive quality, shared with other masterpiece of the 1940s, that makes it a true classic, capable of being endlessly re-interpreted and rediscovered.

The Red Shoes was indeed born from a determination to throw caution to the winds. “You go too far,” the distinguished art director Alfred Jungle warned Michael Powell, whereupon Powell dropped him to take a chance on the painter Hein Heckroth, who would triumphantly unify the film’s backstage and on-stage elements. SO too with the all-important music and dance elements. Powell and his partner Emeric Pressburger rejected a score by their established composer in favor of one by the young Brian Easdale, taking the same risk that the impresario Lermontov does with Julian Craster in the film’s story.

Pressburger had written the first version of the script whiel under contract to Alexander Korda in 1939. Intended as a vehicle for Korda’s future wife Merle Oberon, it was assumed that a real ballerina would double in the dance sequences. But when Powell and Pressubrger now sharing their credits as The Archers, returned to the subject in 1947, Powell insisted that the role of Vicky must be entirely performed by a dancer and that a real ballet must be created. So the rising young ballerina Moira Shearer became the star of Lermontov’s ambitious new production and the film. In Hans Christian Andersen’s savage, moralistic fairy tale, the red shoes that a girl covets lead to her destruction as they dance her to death. In The Archers’ film, the girl lives a more complex version of the story both on stage and in life, when she joins an international ballet company and The Red Shoes brings her fame and love, but also intolerable pressure to submit to the impresario’s will in order to live her dream.

What was revolutionary in 1948 was to create and show a continuous 15-minute ballet that takes us from the stage world into the subjective heart of Vicky’s desires and conflicts. Easdale’s music, Heckroth’s surreal design, Jack Cardiff’s painterly use of Technicolor, and the inspired partnership of leading dancers Helpmann and Massine with Shearer, all combined to make it a landmark in film as ‘total art,’ and immediate inspiration to contemporary filmmakers such as Vincente Minnelli and Stanley Donen. Standing midway between Maya Deren’s avant-garde psychodrama Meshes of the Afternoon (1943) and Jean Cocteau’s poetic allegory Orphee (195), it is now belatedly recognized as a major achievement of Britain’s Neo-Romantic movement, usually identified with painting and poetry, but here triumphantly carried into cinema.”

redshoes1

redshoes3

redshoes6

redshoes5

There are five special screenings of “The Red Shoes” scheduled at UCLA July 31 – August 2. Tickets may be purchased at : https://secure.cinema.ucla.edu/onlineboxoffice/



Karl Malden (1912-2009)
July 1, 2009, 9:10 pm
Filed under: cinema, classic movies, hollywood, movies | Tags: ,

KarlMaldenFilmdom lost one of its finest today. Karl Malden, the blunt-nosed Oscar-winning actor whose career spanned 7 decades, passed away at his Brentford home at the age of 97. Born in 1912 in Gary, Indiana, he first appeared on Broadway in 1937. Taking time off to serve in world war two, Malden returned to the theatre and worked extensively within The Group Theatre in New York City where he made the acquaintances of two men whose careers would intersect to make cinematic history: Elia Kazan and Marlon Brando. Malden’s turn in 1951’s Streetcar Named Desire as Mitch, Marlon Brando’s best friend, earned him an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor.  No less memorable were the critical successes that followed in a slew of challenging, topical pictures such as the seminal On the Waterfront, Baby Doll and Fear Strikes Out.

Malden represents an era in filmmaking when gutsy, relentless performances and envelope-pushing direction helped usher in the dawn of a New Hollywood.

A true original and an unforgettable presence onscreen, Malden’s electric body of work will continue to inspire—always.



A Little Night Music: Café Culture in 50’s Hollywood

Yes, I know it’s a symptom of my having been born in the wrong era, but there’s something about the red orange cigarette glow of a bohemian café in the 50s that drives me wild. Not that I by any means intend to romanticize a lifestyle that could lead to a chronic pulmonary disease, but … give me a crowded café, black turtlenecks, a sexy saxophone and a single malt whisky and I’m a happy camper. The deeply brooding reds and oranges and  blues and blacks  (with a splatter of pink and green thrown in here and there) seem to melt into each other in the heat of the cigarettes and stage lights. And the later the hour, the easier it is to believe that anything is possible within its walls.

Maybe that’s why Hollywood movies in the 50s favored this setting. And given the emotions that such a mood creates, maybe that’s why out of such settings came some of the best musical moments of the decade.

And so, for no particular reason at all, I felt compelled to showcase some of my favorite, scotch-soaked smoky moments on screen:

Audrey Hepburn gets her bebop on in bohemian Paris

Audrey Hepburn gets her bebop on in bohemian Paris

Tab Hunter & Gwen Verdon toast to their lost souls in Damn Yankees

Tab Hunter & Gwen Verdon toast to their lost souls in Damn Yankees

Cyd Charisse & Gene Kelly do a hat trick in Singin’ in the Rain

Cyd Charisse & Gene Kelly do a hat trick in Singin’ in the Rain

And finally, Judy Garland slam-dunks an Arlen & Gershwin number in A Star is Born. It’s such a stunning scene that a screen shot just won’t do it justice. (And if you’ve never seen it, prepare to have your socks blown off by Miss Garland.)



Fun With Fred & Ginger

For no particular reason at all (and why else do we have blogs if not to indulge the whims of our wanton subconscious) today I remembered this scene from RKO’s 1935 film Roberta. The film was based on a smash Broadway musical with music and lyrics by the eternal Jerome Kern and although Fred Astaire & Ginger Rogers are key players, Roberta isn’t a Fred & Ginger vehicle. The story focuses on the story of Irene Dunne and Randolph Scott, but it is Fred & Ginger who own each and every frame. Their  on screen relationship is surprisingly earnest, which makes it even harder to understand why the film isn’t readily mentioned in the same breath as Top Hat and Swing Time and the other titles in the Astaire/Rogers canon.

In this scene, the two have rarely been better–or more organic. They are terrifically young (Ginger was only 22), spry, athletic, Astaire’s choreography is electric and they just look like they are having an absolute ball together.

Talk about infectious! These were the days when movies truly did make magic.