Filed under: cinema, culture, film | Tags: Marcello Mastroianni; Federico Fellini; Italian cinema; foreign film; cinema verite;
I’ve been on some sort of Fellini trip as of late.
Just haven’t been able to get enough of the man and his supremely sensuous phantasmagoria of time, space, shadow and light.
Few directors have so effortlessly (seemingly) blurred the line of fact, fiction, fantasy and farce with such delirious delight … and I think it’s safe to say that 8 1/2, his 1963 masterpiece, is the high watermark of his artistic achievements. (Though not without heated debate, I’m sure!)
If you haven’t seen the film in a while, please revisit it… it’s the sort of film that is entirely like a good bottle of old wine.
Call it ‘neorealism,’ or any other fancy schmansy moniker you can conjure … whatever ‘it‘ is, I’ll tell ya right now, Fellini’s ‘it‘ is eternal.
Just ask Marcello.
Filed under: art, cinema, fashion, film | Tags: 19th century, Abbie Cornish, Ben Whishaw, Bright Star, Fanny Brawne, Jane Campion, John Keats
Normally, I am not exactly what you would call a fan of Jane Campion’s films.
But a few weeks ago, I went to the theater and gave her latest film, Bright Star, a chance. Mostly because Kenneth Turan, the Los Angeles Times’ resident film critic, gave it a simply glowing review … and Turan is rather known for not giving glowing reviews.
I went in with my nose firmly placed in the air, ready to massacre what I was certain would be a self-important, purposefully ‘arty’ picture. And, suddenly, about an hour into it, I realized that I was crying … for no apparent reason at all. It was simply a matter of an unexpected, rushing wave of emotion sweeping over me, and I was caught in its riptide, helpless to resist. The same sort of feeling one gets when reading a challenging poem: the initial distrust, and then, bang, the thrust of emotion that leaves you thoroughly winded … and utterly in love. Rather like a Keats poem, to be honest.
Which is why Bright Star, the delicately beautiful film about the famous love affair between the young John Keats and Fanny Brawne starring the exquisite Abbie Cornish and Ben Whishaw, is so powerfully sensitive and entirely effective. It feels like a poem … not like someone pushing poetry down your throat which, I’m sure you’ll agree, makes all the difference in the world.
Rapturous in its realism, Bright Star feels and breathes and seethes with life and love and beauty. The early 19th century has never been so extraordinarily organic. Even though just a spectator in 2-D, the film pops with color, and vibrancy—we feel the flush of wind on Fanny’s fabric, the fragility of Keat’s coat collar, the quiet sunlight over a field of lavender, the warm breath of a tentative kiss… it is something rarely achieved on screen with such mastery, and my previous issues with Ms. Campions’ pretension have been duly sated.
The film itself is not likely to make a dent in the coming awards season, such is the lot of films of its beauty and weight, but if there’s one thing sure to seduce Academy voters it must surely be the exquisitely artful use of costume. The fabric of Miss Fanny Brawne’s clothing is as much a part of the film’s tapestry as Fanny herself … below are a few of what I consider to be the highlights ….
Filed under: classic movies, film, movies, nostalgia | Tags: Danny Kaye; Virginia Mayo; Sam Goldwyn; Up In Arms; Wonder Man; The Kid From Brooklyn; The Secret Life of Walter Mitty; A Song is Born;
When I was growing up, some of my absolute favorite movies were Sam Goldwyn’s Danny Kaye/Virginia Mayo musicals made during the ‘40s. For a twelve year old, the films were bright, breezy, funny and chock-a-block with snappy tunes and zippy one-liners.
I thought it would be fun to revisit them to see if they’re still just as much fun today as they were then. ( They are.
)
Up in Arms (1944)
Although this film stars Dinah Shore with Kaye, it firmly sets up what was to be the Kaye/Mayo mold. It was Kaye’s first feature film and Goldwyn didn’t want to risk starring two unknowns, so Shore was brought in at the last minute to amp up the star wattage. Co-starring Dana Andrews and Constance Dowling, Up in Arms is Wartime Propaganda at its finest packaged in the form of a fluffy, sweetly silly romp in which hypochondriac Daniel Weems (Kaye) and best friend Joe (Andrews) are drafted into the army where Kaye’s obsessive compulsive behavior lands them both into a bottomless pit of hot water. Dinah Shore’s Tess’ Torch Song is a definite highlight, but more than that, Up In Arms first introduces us to what would be Kaye’s signature: his tongue-twisting, rapid-fire monologues.
Decades before the likes of Jim Carrey, and well before Jerry Lewis, Danny Kaye wrote the book on rubber-faced comic madness.
Written in partnership with his wife Sylvia Fine, Kaye’s singular mix of pantomime, song and dance is truly unique and are here unleashed for the first time. Kaye’s Melody in 4-F, a smashing stage success for him, is captured on film in Up In Arms … although tamed considerably for the censors.
Wonder Man (1945)
Wonder Man is a tired premise executed with delightful freshness and creativity. Kaye plays identical twins: bookworm Edwin Dingle and nightclub singer Buzzy Bellew. When Buzzy is knocked off by notorious gangster ‘Ten Grand Jackson’ for being the Man Who Knew Too Much, the only person who can bring the thugs to justice is Edwin—with a little help from the ghost of Buzzy, that is. (The special effects in the film, by the way, were cutting edge and won a special Oscar.) Buzzy’s ghost possesses his brother in order to lead the cops to Jackson, resulting in the proverbial tangled web we weave: Mild-mannered Dingle, with a squeaky-clean sweetheart of his own (Virginia Mayo) is forced to pretend to be the outrageous Buzzy who happens to be engaged to nightclub hottie Midge Mallone (Vera-Ellen). A cliché of a plot, perhaps, with predictable set pieces, definitely, but Kaye’s wild versatility and show-stopping shenanigans keeps the film fresh and funny. Vera-Ellen makes her feature film debut here, and her sensational talents are well showcased, particularly in a dazzling number entitled So In Love, and I am happy to report that it is just as delightful to me now as it was at the ripe old age of 12. The colors and the costumes are eye popping, but Ellen’s talent is what’s truly jaw-dropping:
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAizey5VDu8&feature=related]
p.s.: POTATO SALAD!
The Kid From Brooklyn (1946)
By the time Kaye and Mayo were cast in Goldwyn’s 1946 remake of Harold Lloyd’s The Milky Way, the team was box office gold. And even though The Kid From Brooklyn lacks Wonder Man’s ingenuity and spunk, it is still breezy, easy entertainment. Delightful, if not a bit dizzy, the film follows the exploits of milkman Burleigh Sullivan who apparently knocks out the middleweight champion of the world. Not exactly good PR for the champ’s agent who concocts a scam to profit over the mishap. He takes the gullible Burleigh and touts him as a boxing sensation, fixing fights across the country to turn him into a star. The fact that Burleigh boxes like he’s waving hello leads to quite a few memorable moments, particularly Eve Arden (the manager’s gal pal) who teaches him the ropes of boxing to the tune of Johann Strauss’ Blue Danube: “Trah-la-la-la-la-boom-boom-boom-boom!” The manager then bets against Burleigh in a Vegas-esque fight and, well, you can guess the outcome. Vera-Ellen is Burleigh’s dancing sister and Mayo is the singer that falls for him. Even though Mayo lip sync’s her numbers, it’s still a lot of fun to watch the Sammy Kahn numbers.
And oh those Goldwyn Girls.
The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (1947)
The Secret Life of Walter Mitty remains the most famous of the Goldwyn/Kaye/Mayo films, and understandably so. Norman McLeod, who had brought to the screen classics such as Topper, Lady Be Good as well as Wonder Man and Kid From Brooklyn, finely helms this memorably sweet, smart and sassy story of the loveable daydreamer Walter Mitty. Walter Mitty is a beleaguered wage slave at a pulp-fiction publishing company who is utterly (pardon the expression) pussy-whipped by his mother and fiancé, and retreats into his daydreams to find solace and assert himself as a man. When the woman of his dreams (Mayo) turns up on his train into town one unexpected morning, Mitty is pulled into a game of cat and mouse that turns his life upside down. Mayo, whose roles are painfully cookie-cutter in the Goldwyn films, is here able to actually flex some acting chops (more to follow in A Song is Born) and backed up by the likes of Boris Karloff, Faye Bainter and Ann Rutherford results in pure cinematic gold. It is also perhaps the most ‘mainstream’ Kaye/Mayo film—not the fluffy extravaganzas of the earlier films, but a film that pivots around a plot the viewer actually invests in. Mitty’s daydreams are terrific fun, as are the character actors and the suspense ramps up to a nail-bitingly fun finale.
A Song is Born (1948)
Long-time readers of the Pictorial will know exactly how dear this film is to our heart. Howard Hawks’ remake of his beloved 1941 screwball Stanwyck-Cooper starrer Ball of Fire is not the finely crafted sophisticated romp the original was … but it’s the music that makes this film positively priceless. In my opinion, the film contains s segment of celluloid that is living history in its most impressively organic form. Here we have the unprecedented (and arguably unmatched) interracial jazz ensemble of Tommy Dorsey, Lionel Hampton, Mel Powell, Benny Goodman, Charlie Barnett (WOW!) and Pops himself, Louis Armstrong, jamming together in the film’s titular A Song is Born. Kaye is his usual, stuttering, bumbling self, but it is Mayo who really gets to dig into the role. Taking her cue from Barbara Stanwyck’s femme fatale of the 1941 original, it is easy to see how Mayo would go on to play such tough jawed dames as White Heat’s Verna Jarret. (She’d already proven her range as Dana Andrew’s philandering wife in The Best Years Of Our Lives.) It is the last Kaye/Mayo pairing, and was a disappointment at the box office, but it certaily deserves rediscovery … if for no other reason than the following fabulous musical scenes:
Filed under: classic movies, film, movies | Tags: Asta Nielsen, buster Keaton, chaplin, Conrad Veidt, gloria swanson, Greta Garbo, J’accuse, Laila, Lillian Gish, London Film Festival, rudolph valentino, silent film, silent movies, Underground
A thoughtful and expressive piece appeared in today’s Guardian, praising the value, worth and beauty of silent cinema.
Three silent’s are slated to be screened at the London Film Festival later this month: Underground (1928, directed by Anthony Asquith), J’accuse! (1919, directed by Abel Gance), and Laila (1929, directed by George Schneevoigt), which, Guardian writer Ronald Bergan says, remind modern audiences just how eloquent dialogue-free movies are capable of being. He also makes the provocative argument that “if cinema history had started with sound, it would have been necessary to invent silent movies.”
Read his reverent op-ed below:
The London film festival is screening three silent classics this year, reminding us just how eloquent dialogue-free movies are capable of being.
Is there anyone out there who still needs to be convinced of the superiority of silent movies? They hold their own easily against sound, colour and widescreen films in any canonical list. Silent movies are the ne plus ultra of cinema. The rest is… theatre or literature. How exciting, therefore, that this year’s London film festival is screening three silent movie treasures: one British (Underground, 23 October), one French (J’Accuse, 24 October) and one Norwegian (Laila, 29 October).
Pre-sound movies are closer to Erwin Panovsky’s definition of cinema as “the dynamisation of space and the spacialisation of time”, and to Alfred Hitchcock’s belief in “pure cinema”. When film theorists attempt to define cinematic specificity, it is to non-talkies that they turn. I have a theory that if cinema history had started with sound, it would have been necessary to invent silent movies.
Actually, there is no such thing as a silent movie, because a musical accompaniment was an essential component of every performance. And how can anything so eloquent be termed “silent”? That is why I prefer to call them pre-sound movies, or non-talkies. Ironically, one of the few things that non-talkies couldn’t do was create silence. Silence as an acoustic effect exists only where sounds can be heard, as in Abel Gance’s The Life and Loves of Beethoven (1937), in a sequence where the composer loses his hearing. Incidentally, it is interesting to compare Gance’s non-talkie 1919 version of J’Accuse – which depicts death, delusion and insanity in the trenches – with his far less effective talkie remake of 1938.
Pre-sound films were more universal, with no need for subtitles or dubbing – FW Murnau’s The Last Laugh (1924) is so expressive that intertitles were unnecessary. Charlie Chaplin, feeling that talkies would limit his international appeal, and being popular enough, resisted dialogue for 13 years, making two of the screen’s greatest comedies, City Lights (1931) and Modern Times (1936), in the midst of an avalanche of talk.
Much is written about the cinematographic beauty and the use of montage in pre-sound films (for Sergei Eisenstein, sound destroyed montage, which he considered the essence of cinema) but of equal importance were the closeup and the performances. The absence of the spoken word concentrates the spectator’s attention more closely on the visual aspect of behaviour. Acting in non-talkies, now a lost art, had to be done in a manner different from the style on stage or the reality of ordinary life. This was precisely what the great actors of the silent period accomplished, far from the pantomimic exaggeration seen in films like Singin’ in the Rain. Lillian Gish, Gloria Swanson, Chaplin, Buster Keaton, Conrad Veidt, Greta Garbo, Rudolph Valentino and Asta Nielsen were among those that gave the most extraordinary performances in screen history. As Norma Desmond (Swanson) says in Sunset Boulevard (1950): “We didn’t need dialogue. We had faces.”
Filed under: film, movies | Tags: A Fistful of Dollars, A Fistful of Dynamite, For a Few Dollars More, Once Upon a Time in America, Once Upon a Time in the West, Rome Film Festival, Sergio Leone, spaghetti western, the Bad and the Ugly, The Colossus of Rhodes, The Good
Spaghetti Westerns and Sergio Leone are the cinematic equivalent of bacon and eggs. Peanut butter and jelly. Or any other divinely matched pairing the world would not be quite the same without. (although I could get along quite well without bacon and eggs, but for sake of argument…) Although slim in number, the seven feature films that make up Leone’s body of work had the remarkable effect of reinventing a dead genre (the Western) with his own brand of grit, realism and sweeping beauty. In watching his films today, it is little wonder that the director’s first job was as an assistant on Vittorio de Cica’s The Bicycle Thief—the good guys and the bad guys are equals as flawed, corruptible, f’d up humans. Hence the eternal humanity of Leone’s work.
To mark Leone’s 80th birthday, and the 20th anniversary of his death, the Rome Film Festival has paid tribute to the Italian director with a special exhibition of photographs taken from the Leone family archives, the Cineteca di Bologna and the Experimental Centre of Cinematography.
A selection from the exhibit follows below:
Hot off the Los Angeles Times press:
Responding to public outcry over the Los Angeles County Museum of Art’s decision to end its 40-year-old weekend film program, two outside organizations have stepped forward to pledge a total of $150,000 in the fight to save the screening series.
The Hollywood Foreign Press Assn., which organizes the annual Golden Globe Awards, and Time Warner Cable, in association with Ovation TV, have each agreed to put up $75,000 toward the LACMA film program, which had been scheduled to close in October.
In addition, Time Warner Cable and Ovation said that they will spend more than $1.5 million to market the film program across their multiple media platforms, both locally and nationally.
A spokeswoman for the museum told The Times that as a result of the new money, the film program will now continue at least through the end of the fiscal year in June 2010. She added that the museum will continue to seek additional donors and patrons in support of the film program.
In a statement, LACMA Director Michael Govan said that the museum is ”grateful to the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, Time Warner Cable, and Ovation TV, for expressing their tangible support for the art of film at LACMA, and we’re very pleased that we can keep film rolling while we build for the future.”
The museum also announced that it intends to create a film department within its curatorial ranks that will be in charge of “thinking about the history and future of film as art as well as film’s increasing importance in the larger narrative of art history.”
– David Ng
Thanks to Marty and Mr. Shickel for getting the ball rolling on this, and to the Hollywood Foreign Press Assoc and (I never thought I’d say this) Time Warner Cable (even though they overcharged me two months in a row) for keeping LA’s premier film program alive!
Filed under: art, arts, culture, film, movies, preservation | Tags: los angeles, Martin Scorsese; LACMA; Richard Schickel;, museum of art
I heart Marty Scorsese.
And when he goes and does things like this, well, it just sends me all aflutter.
First, a bit of background.
For nearly four decades, the film program at the Los Angeles Country Museum of Art has been a primary venue for film lovers to gather for some of the most engaging retrospectives in LA.
But LACMA director Michael Govan has decided to pull the film program, citing declining audiences and $1 million in losses over the past decade. Govan claims that the move will allow them to “pause for re-thinking.” But you, me, Marty and just about everyone else who gives a damn about film history can see through that one like an episode of Gray’s Anatomy.
Over the past two weeks, a slew of damning op-eds have appeared from some of the most powerfully persuasive pens in the industry—Richard Schickel and Kenneth Turan to name the few.
Mr. Schickel states “It is the duty of museums to place before us the accumulated works of the ages, movies definitely included — old and new; obscure and well known; good, bad and absurd — in order to keep us in touch with the rich and ever-informative history of an ever-evolving, yes, I’ll say it, art form …The fact that good movies arise out of a corrupt commercial system makes it more, not less, worthy of our attention. How in the world does a “Chinatown” arise out of that unpromising soil?”
And now, a letter to Mr. Govan from that preeminent film crusader, Martin Scorsese.
“I am deeply disturbed by the recent decision to suspend the majority of film screenings at LACMA. For those of us who love cinema and believe in its value as an art form, this news hits hard.
We all know that the film industry, like many other institutions and industries, has to be radically rebuilt for the future. This is now apparent to everyone. But in the midst of all this change, the value and power of cinema’s past will only increase, and the need to show films as they were intended to be shown will become that much more pressing. So I find it profoundly disheartening to know that a vital outlet for the exhibition of what was once known as “repertory cinema” has been cut off in L.A. of all places, the center of film production and the land of the movie-making itself. My personal connection to LACMA stretches back almost 40 years to when I lived in L.A.during the ’70s and regularly attended their vibrant film series, programmed by the legendary Ron Haver. It was actually at LACMA, during a 20th Century Fox retrospective, that I first became aware of the issues of color film fading and the urgent need for film preservation. Ian Birnie, a programmer of immaculate taste and knowledge, has continued in the tradition of Ron Haver, who was so well-versed in cinema past and present. I do not understand why this approach to programming needs to be re-thought. I am puzzled by the notion of pegging future film programming to “artist-created films,” as stated in the letter announcing this shift – to do this would be tantamount to downgrading the worth of cinema. Aren’t the best films made by artists in the first place?
Without places like LACMA and other museums, archives, and festivals where people can still see a wide variety of films projected on screen with an audience, what do we lose? We lose what makes the movies so powerful and such a pervasive cultural influence. If this is not valued in Hollywood, what does that say about the future of the art form? Aren’t museums serving a cultural purpose beyond appealing to the largest possible audience? I know that my life and work have been enriched by places like LACMA and MoMA whose public screening programs enabled me to see films that would never have appeared at my local movie theater, and that lose a considerable amount of their power and beauty on smaller screens.
I believe that LACMA is taking an unfortunate course of action. I support the petition that is still circulating, with well over a thousand names at this point, many of them prominent. It comes as no surprise to me that the public is rallying. People from all over the world are speaking out, because they see this action – correctly, I think – as a serious rebuke to film within the context of the art world. The film department is often held at arms’ length at LACMA and other institutions, separate from the fine arts, and this simply should not be. Film departments should be accorded the same respect, and the same amount of financial leeway, as any other department of fine arts. To do otherwise is a disservice to cinema, and to the public as well.
I hope that LACMA will reverse this unfortunate decision.
–Martin Scorsese
New York, N.Y.
I hope that Mr. Govan reads Marty’s letter without the sort of culturecrat piety that seems have crippled his powers of reason on this particular decision.
Filed under: classic movies, film, hollywood, movies | Tags: Harold Lloyd; silent film; comedy; Hal Roach; Chaplin; Keaton
Wednesday, August 5th, Harold Lloyd gets the start treatment in TCM’s Summer Under the Stars. Lloyd’s seminal pieces, Safety Last, The Freshman, Girl Shy and Hot Water, will be shown as part of a 19-film salute to one of cinema’s greatest comedians. TCM’s fabulously fun website is hosts to a bundle of Lloyd goodies–definitely worth visit or two. (31 actors in all will be paid tribute to each day in August and it’s great to see that people like Harold Lloyd, Sterling Hayden, Marion Davies, even Miriam Hopkins, even will get the sort of attention they deserve but don’t often receive.)
Harold Lloyd tends to get lost in the shuffle in the subject of the silent greats, taking a seemingly pre-destined third seat to Chaplin and Keaton. This may perhaps incline some to regard his work as somehow inferior to Chaplin and Keaton.
That, my friends, is a load of bologna.
Lloyd may perhaps lack certain Chaplinesque and Keatonesque qualities– but his films are hardly ‘inferior.’
There is a reason that Harold Lloyd’s films consistently topped the box office in the twenties–and even outperformed his better known contemporaries. Lloyd was a hard-working professional and his every-guy underdog appeal resonated with audiences. Finding success with Hal Roach in the late teens and early 20s, Lloyd went on to run his own production company which produced his finest features, namely, Girl Shy, The Freshman and Speedy. He made a semi-successful transition to sound, but the Depression was against the happy-go-lucky character that had made him famous. Lloyd, too, was terribly protective about the quality of his films and demaneded a high price for them (and rightfully so). The problem is that since Keaton and Chaplin comedies were much more readily available, the reuptation of Lloyd’s repetoire suffered, leading many to simply assume him to be the least of the holy trinity of silent comedy.

Lloyd with his delightful leading lady Jobyna Ralson in "The Freshman," 1925. A fabulous satire on college life.
This is not fair, for Lloyd’s comedies are bright, sophisticated, smart and vastly entertaining– more than just a gangly fella hanging from the clock tower of a downtown high-rise, Lloyd learned well from Chaplin’s pathos and earnesty, as well as from Keaton’s symmetry and technicality, and demonstrated them all ever so superbly in his highly enjoyable feature films.
Watch them this Wednesday with open eyes and open hearts– he will enchant you.
Harold’s full lineup is as follows:
6:00 AM Bumping Into Broadway (’19)
6:30 AM From Hand to Mouth (’19)
7:00 AM Number Please (’20)
7:30 AM A Sailor Made Man (’21)
8:30 AM Grandma’s Boy (’22)
9:30 AM Dr. Jack (’22)
10:30 AM Safety Last! (’23)
12:00 PM Why Worry? (’23)
1:15 PM Girl Shy (’24)
2:45 PM Hot Water (’24)
3:45 PM The Freshman (’25)
5:15 PM For Heaven’s Sake (’26)
6:30 PM The Kid Brother (’27)
8:00 PM Speedy (’28)
9:30 PM Welcome Danger (’29)
11:30 PM Feet First (’30)
1:15 AM Movie Crazy (’32)
3:00 AM The Milky Way (“36)
4:30 AM Mad Wednesday (AKA The Sin of Harold Diddlebock) (’47)
Filed under: cinema, classic movies, film, preservation | Tags: Anton Walbrook, Emeric Pressburger, Moira Shearer, The Archers, The Red Shoes; Michael Powell
Last night, I had the supreme pleasure of attending the North American world premiere of the newly restored version of Powell and Pressburger’s 1948 artistic marvel The Red Shoes. The film, one of cinema’s crowning achievements in color, motion and music, has been restored by the UCLA Film and Television archive, with the support of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, The Louis B Mayer Foundation and The Film Foundation. Why a film that, even on shoddy VHS transfers is still eye-popping, would need restoration was the subject of last night’s opening discourse..
Thankfully the UCLA film preservationists got to work on the matter as mold had begun to deteriorate the original prints and color flickering, color fringing and misalignment turned the restoration process into a three-year labor of love. He prints are now ‘properly preserved for posterity.’
The results, I can assure you, are marvelous. It is a pity that films such as these cannot be easily seen on the big screen because the experience is truly, well, cinematic. The sheer creative energy of the late, great Jack Cardiff’s cinematography is amplified ten-fold. Anton Walbrook, whose performance is riveting enough as it is even on the tiniest of screens, in its full-scale projected form nothing short of mesmerizing. Moira Shearer’s acrobatic elegance is absolutely breathtaking on a thirty-foot screen–which turns into a swirling canvas of dreamy color for an exquisite 133 minutes.
The following is an excerpt from film historian Ian Christie’s lovely assessment of the meaning and importance of the Red Shoes:
“Seen in full-scale projection, The Red Shoes is not only one of cinema’s great sensuous experiences, but a profound mediation on the power and the price of the all-consuming spectacle. Beyond the intensity of its performances and the beauty of its images, it is this reflexive quality, shared with other masterpiece of the 1940s, that makes it a true classic, capable of being endlessly re-interpreted and rediscovered.
The Red Shoes was indeed born from a determination to throw caution to the winds. “You go too far,” the distinguished art director Alfred Jungle warned Michael Powell, whereupon Powell dropped him to take a chance on the painter Hein Heckroth, who would triumphantly unify the film’s backstage and on-stage elements. SO too with the all-important music and dance elements. Powell and his partner Emeric Pressburger rejected a score by their established composer in favor of one by the young Brian Easdale, taking the same risk that the impresario Lermontov does with Julian Craster in the film’s story.
Pressburger had written the first version of the script whiel under contract to Alexander Korda in 1939. Intended as a vehicle for Korda’s future wife Merle Oberon, it was assumed that a real ballerina would double in the dance sequences. But when Powell and Pressubrger now sharing their credits as The Archers, returned to the subject in 1947, Powell insisted that the role of Vicky must be entirely performed by a dancer and that a real ballet must be created. So the rising young ballerina Moira Shearer became the star of Lermontov’s ambitious new production and the film. In Hans Christian Andersen’s savage, moralistic fairy tale, the red shoes that a girl covets lead to her destruction as they dance her to death. In The Archers’ film, the girl lives a more complex version of the story both on stage and in life, when she joins an international ballet company and The Red Shoes brings her fame and love, but also intolerable pressure to submit to the impresario’s will in order to live her dream.
What was revolutionary in 1948 was to create and show a continuous 15-minute ballet that takes us from the stage world into the subjective heart of Vicky’s desires and conflicts. Easdale’s music, Heckroth’s surreal design, Jack Cardiff’s painterly use of Technicolor, and the inspired partnership of leading dancers Helpmann and Massine with Shearer, all combined to make it a landmark in film as ‘total art,’ and immediate inspiration to contemporary filmmakers such as Vincente Minnelli and Stanley Donen. Standing midway between Maya Deren’s avant-garde psychodrama Meshes of the Afternoon (1943) and Jean Cocteau’s poetic allegory Orphee (195), it is now belatedly recognized as a major achievement of Britain’s Neo-Romantic movement, usually identified with painting and poetry, but here triumphantly carried into cinema.”
There are five special screenings of “The Red Shoes” scheduled at UCLA July 31 – August 2. Tickets may be purchased at : https://secure.cinema.ucla.edu/onlineboxoffice/































































