Filed under: classic movies, hollywood, movies | Tags: Fred Astaire; MGM; Royal Wedding
The following film clip just sums everything up: why Fred Astaire is a legend, why the Studio System worked, why CGI sucks, why the movies were were once absolute magic, and why Hollywood today is utterly doomed. It’s all there. In this five and a half minute snippet from MGM’s Royal Wedding.
(for more Kitty Packard Pictorial fun with Fred–and Ginger too– click here.)
Filed under: classic movies, hollywood, movies | Tags: Audrey Hepburn, Breakfast at Tiffany’s, Charade, My Fair Lady, Roman Holiday, Sabrina
If any movie star is a testament to the timelessness of classic film, it is Audrey Hepburn. For well over five decades the actress has been the symbol of everything sophisticated, chic and classy. Today she is the evergreen goddess whose little black dress, flawless taste and unearthly beauty remains a benchmark for high fashion—something that, unfortunately, overshadows her very solid body of work as an accomplished actress. Because it is her truly rare sincerity of character, her kindness of heart and sparkling spunk that dazzled audiences then and remains infectious to this day.
This weekend, LACMA’s film program (miraculously saved from the depths of despair) will kick off a tribute to one of Hollywood’s geunine leading ladies (for Audrey was a definitive lady) with a retrospective entitled Audrey Hepburn: Then, Now and Forever. While showcasing her well known classics Roman Holiday, Sabrina, Breakfast At Tiffany’s and My Fair Lady, the program will also include the roles that defined her as a quality actress, specifically the spine-tingling thriller Wait Until Dark and the deliciously sexy mystery romance Charade.
From the LACMA website:
“Perhaps the most beloved actress to emerge from the postwar studio system, Hepburn had brains, style, charm, class, and great timing. Eisenhower and Marilyn Monroe were the competing images of a newly suburbanized America, but for audiences excited by a flood of images from a rebuilt modern Europe, Hepburn was a revelation: she represented the aristocratic tradition rebottled as a hip, slim European girl with American-friendly qualities—such as spunk and wit—and old-school manners, particularly toward her elders. Hollywood took note and Hepburn was paired with many of the biggest male stars of the previous decade in a series of beautifully written comedies and romances that drew audiences into an idealized and sophisticated world.”
The screening schedule is as follows:
October 23 7:30 PM Roman Holiday
October 23 9:40 PM They All Laughed
October 24 7:30 PM Breakfast at Tiffany’s
October 24 9:35 PM Two for the Road
October 30 7:30 PM Sabrina
October 30 9:35 PM Love in the Afternoon
November 6 7:30 PM Charade
November 6 9:35 PM Wait Until Dark
November 7 7:30 PM War and Peace
November 13 7:30 PM My Fair Lady
Hope you can make it, dah-ling … and so does Cat!
Filed under: 1930s, arts, hollywood, nostalgia, vintage | Tags: 1935, George Hurrell, Jean Harlow, Katharine Hepburn, Vanity Fair, vintage magazine
Vanity Fair’s website has a nifty little feature that I think all you Pictorial readers might get a kick out of. Vintage Vanity Fair allows you to flip through (virtually speaking) a vintage issue of the magazine. The full January 1935 issue is up on their website and a heck of a lot of fun to peruse. Vanity Fair’s renowned humor and satire is in top form, as its illustrations, which in this issue, feature Mexican artist Jose Covarribuias.
There is a fascinating piece about the matter of the Saarland—a tiny region sandwiched between Germany and France which had been occupied by the Allies since the Treaty of Versailles—it’s 15 year mandate was expiring the month of the issue’s publication and its political future was of hot debate. Hollywood’s Golden Age is beautifully documented too, with an iconic Jean Harlow shot by George Hurrell and a particularly intriguing photo of Katharine Hepburn labeled “Box Office Riot.” One year before another publication starting with a “V” dubbed her Box Office Poison.
Have a look for yourself. I’ve included some of the spreads below.
Hot off the Los Angeles Times press:
Responding to public outcry over the Los Angeles County Museum of Art’s decision to end its 40-year-old weekend film program, two outside organizations have stepped forward to pledge a total of $150,000 in the fight to save the screening series.
The Hollywood Foreign Press Assn., which organizes the annual Golden Globe Awards, and Time Warner Cable, in association with Ovation TV, have each agreed to put up $75,000 toward the LACMA film program, which had been scheduled to close in October.
In addition, Time Warner Cable and Ovation said that they will spend more than $1.5 million to market the film program across their multiple media platforms, both locally and nationally.
A spokeswoman for the museum told The Times that as a result of the new money, the film program will now continue at least through the end of the fiscal year in June 2010. She added that the museum will continue to seek additional donors and patrons in support of the film program.
In a statement, LACMA Director Michael Govan said that the museum is ”grateful to the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, Time Warner Cable, and Ovation TV, for expressing their tangible support for the art of film at LACMA, and we’re very pleased that we can keep film rolling while we build for the future.”
The museum also announced that it intends to create a film department within its curatorial ranks that will be in charge of “thinking about the history and future of film as art as well as film’s increasing importance in the larger narrative of art history.”
– David Ng
Thanks to Marty and Mr. Shickel for getting the ball rolling on this, and to the Hollywood Foreign Press Assoc and (I never thought I’d say this) Time Warner Cable (even though they overcharged me two months in a row) for keeping LA’s premier film program alive!
Filed under: 1930s, classic movies, hollywood | Tags: Dick Powell, Footlight Parade, James Cagney, Joan Blondell, Ruby Keeler
This poster of the 1933 musical Footlight Parade is definitive sexy pre-code ‘tude.
If you’ve not had the pleasure of viewing Lloyd Bacon’s film, it is ceratinly one that belongs in your Netflix queue. Its admittedly throwaway backstage plot is more than compensated by all manner of early 30s cellophane fancies, namely, a scorchingly hot Joan Blondell, a never-been-better Ruby Keeler and Cagney–oh, Cagney–proving once and for all that a tough little cuss can strut a softshoe and still be a hell of a he-man.
And then, of course, there’s the matter of the music. Harry Warren and Al Dubin bringing to the screen the delicious subtle salaciousness that can only come from pre-code cinema.
Shanghai Lil, anyone?
Don’t you just adore the early 30s deco geometry?
Filed under: cinema, classic movies, entertainment, hollywood, movies | Tags: Harvey, Jimmy Stewart, re-make, Steven Spielberg, Tom Hanks
The relentless Hollywood remake machine strikes again.
The next classic film to get the rehash treatment in what has become a never-ending slew of rehash treatments? 1950’s Oscar winning light comedy Harvey.
That’s right, the much-loved precious Pooka tale is being retold with Steven Spielberg at the helm.
According to this morning’s Variety, shooting is going to start early next year and the role of Jimmy Stewart’s Elwood P. Down is expected to be offered to the likes of Tom Hanks and Will Smith.
Now, I absolutely adore Tom Hanks and definitely think that a family-friendly film might be good for his career at the moment, but … the obvious questions that begs to be answered is …
is this really necessary?
Sure, the original film was an adaptation of a Pulitzer prize winning play, and perhaps I am being a bit too protective. But … Harvey is such a part of postwar American idealism, I honestly do wonder if the story as a vehicle can even work anymore? The wide-eyed innocence that is so vital to Elwood P Dowd’s character simply doesn’t exist these days and I wonder if even someone as talented as Mr. Hanks would be able to pull it off in a manner that could make the audience believe in Harvey the way we do with Stewart.
And who could possibly follow Josephine Hull?
Sigh.
We’re going to keep the development of this project tightly under our radar.
Filed under: classic movies, film, hollywood, movies | Tags: Harold Lloyd; silent film; comedy; Hal Roach; Chaplin; Keaton
Wednesday, August 5th, Harold Lloyd gets the start treatment in TCM’s Summer Under the Stars. Lloyd’s seminal pieces, Safety Last, The Freshman, Girl Shy and Hot Water, will be shown as part of a 19-film salute to one of cinema’s greatest comedians. TCM’s fabulously fun website is hosts to a bundle of Lloyd goodies–definitely worth visit or two. (31 actors in all will be paid tribute to each day in August and it’s great to see that people like Harold Lloyd, Sterling Hayden, Marion Davies, even Miriam Hopkins, even will get the sort of attention they deserve but don’t often receive.)
Harold Lloyd tends to get lost in the shuffle in the subject of the silent greats, taking a seemingly pre-destined third seat to Chaplin and Keaton. This may perhaps incline some to regard his work as somehow inferior to Chaplin and Keaton.
That, my friends, is a load of bologna.
Lloyd may perhaps lack certain Chaplinesque and Keatonesque qualities– but his films are hardly ‘inferior.’
There is a reason that Harold Lloyd’s films consistently topped the box office in the twenties–and even outperformed his better known contemporaries. Lloyd was a hard-working professional and his every-guy underdog appeal resonated with audiences. Finding success with Hal Roach in the late teens and early 20s, Lloyd went on to run his own production company which produced his finest features, namely, Girl Shy, The Freshman and Speedy. He made a semi-successful transition to sound, but the Depression was against the happy-go-lucky character that had made him famous. Lloyd, too, was terribly protective about the quality of his films and demaneded a high price for them (and rightfully so). The problem is that since Keaton and Chaplin comedies were much more readily available, the reuptation of Lloyd’s repetoire suffered, leading many to simply assume him to be the least of the holy trinity of silent comedy.

Lloyd with his delightful leading lady Jobyna Ralson in "The Freshman," 1925. A fabulous satire on college life.
This is not fair, for Lloyd’s comedies are bright, sophisticated, smart and vastly entertaining– more than just a gangly fella hanging from the clock tower of a downtown high-rise, Lloyd learned well from Chaplin’s pathos and earnesty, as well as from Keaton’s symmetry and technicality, and demonstrated them all ever so superbly in his highly enjoyable feature films.
Watch them this Wednesday with open eyes and open hearts– he will enchant you.
Harold’s full lineup is as follows:
6:00 AM Bumping Into Broadway (’19)
6:30 AM From Hand to Mouth (’19)
7:00 AM Number Please (’20)
7:30 AM A Sailor Made Man (’21)
8:30 AM Grandma’s Boy (’22)
9:30 AM Dr. Jack (’22)
10:30 AM Safety Last! (’23)
12:00 PM Why Worry? (’23)
1:15 PM Girl Shy (’24)
2:45 PM Hot Water (’24)
3:45 PM The Freshman (’25)
5:15 PM For Heaven’s Sake (’26)
6:30 PM The Kid Brother (’27)
8:00 PM Speedy (’28)
9:30 PM Welcome Danger (’29)
11:30 PM Feet First (’30)
1:15 AM Movie Crazy (’32)
3:00 AM The Milky Way (“36)
4:30 AM Mad Wednesday (AKA The Sin of Harold Diddlebock) (’47)
Filed under: 1930s, classic movies, hollywood, movies | Tags: Joan Fontaine; Errol Flynn; Gone With the Wind, Olivia de Havilland; Independent UK; interview;
Thank goodness for the blogosphere. If it hadn’t been for the always-on-top-of-things Movie Classics blog (definitely one of the better blogs out there), I would have missed out on a major, major interview the UK’s Independent recently published with Olivia De Havilland.
The 93 year old living legend begins her interview with spunk and spirit: “Come and sit on this side of me,” she says. “So that I can hear you better. And I do encourage you to help yourself. Please have at least a sip of champagne.” From Errol Flynn to beating the studio system and everything in between (well, almost: her sister Joan Fontaine is very much a taboo issue), we realize that Miss De Havilland is quite right when she says: “”I feel like a survivor from an age that people no longer understand. I want to try to explain what the 1930s – the golden age of Hollywood – was truly like.” And yes, that does mean an autobiography, which she hopes to have a draft of by September.
But why are you still here? Read it now!




































